Criteria to assess the quality of the Dutch Informal Pro-active Approach Model / A.T. Marseille, K.J. de Graaf
If citizens in the Netherlands do not agree with a decision of a public authority, they can submit a written objection. The Informal Pro-active Approach Model (or "informal approach") provides an alternative for the traditional conflict resolution procedures. This informal approach has led to a reduction in the number of objections that resulted in a formal decision and in an increase in the number of objections that resulted in an agreement between the parties in the conflict. However, there is a growing need to be able to assess whether the informal approach is in fact successful. This paper focuses on the question what set of criteria should be used to assess the quality of procedures, the informal approach and their outcomes. It is important that the criteria reflect the purpose of the informal approach: to provide a fair procedure leading to an acceptable and legitimate outcome of the dispute between the citizen and the public authority. An assessment of four publications that formulate
Criteria to assess the quality of the Dutch Informal Pro-active Approach Model